Disparities in data entry and knowledge analytics know-how are what give institutional gamers an edge over common retail buyers within the digital asset area.

The core concept behind Markets Professional, Cointelegraph’s crypto-intelligence platform powered by knowledge analytics agency The Tie, is to equalize the data asymmetries current within the cryptocurrency market.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

Markets Pro bridges the hole of those asymmetries with its world-class performance: the quant-style VORTECS™ Rating.

The VORTECS™ Rating is an algorithmic comparability of a number of key market metrics for every coin using years of historic knowledge that assesses whether or not the outlook for an asset is bullish, bearish or impartial at any given second primarily based on the historic file of worth motion.

The VORTECS™ Rating is designed to inform merchants that one thing has simply occurred that — previously — reliably moved asset costs.

That’s why a great Markets Professional chart is one which exhibits occasions taking place in the fitting order and on the proper time: First comes the indicator, after which worth motion follows.

Within the final couple of days, we’ve got noticed various exemplary eventualities illustrating basic Markets Professional insights into the market.

MATIC: VORTECS™ supplies an unique foreshadowing of worth drop

November began off promising for these invested in Polygon (MATIC) — however any expectations for lasting beneficial properties can be left in ruins. The token, regardless of seeing a cushty rise to $1.25 on November 8, 2022, would undergo a steep fall of 35.4% right down to $0.807 simply two days later.

Following this was a shocking resurgence, with MATIC going again as much as $1.13 on November 11. However right here’s the kicker: Whereas most merchants solely noticed what was on the floor — MATIC’s potential resurgence in a bear market — Markets Pro members had entry to a wider view.

Even when the value development regarded promising, the market situations remained traditionally unfavorable for MATIC, suggesting a main promoting alternative — which got here to fruition with one other 22.1% dip to $0.883.

Image_0

Since August, MATIC’s VORTECS™ Rating remained under 74, foreshadowing a worth drop that, by all conventional measures, ran opposite to MATIC’s early November bull run as much as $1.25.

All through the primary half of November, its VORTECS™ Rating hovered between 54 and 60. This offered incredible alternatives to money in on not one, however two, worth dips for all buyers with entry to Markets Pro — no matter their degree of expertise.

GST: VORTECS™ predicts 12% dip

Equally, the Inexperienced Satoshi Token (GST) token noticed a pump from $0.023 to $0.042 — an 82.6% improve — between November 3–6.

Whereas the common investor might have been spurred on to purchase in case the value continued upwards, Markets Professional members have been in a position to deduce that this worth motion was a pink herring.

It is because on the very peak of GST’s bull run, its VORTECS™ Rating took a nosedive from 48 right down to 24.

Members conversant in Markets Pro’s VORTECS™ scoring system would know that 40, a lot much less 24, meant the equal of pink flags and warning bells — and would have had a possibility to forestall a serious loss to their place within the coin.

Image_1

On the time of this writing, GST’s VORTECS™ Rating is 50 and its token worth is again round $0.022.

Cointelegraph Markets Professional is available exclusively to members at $99 per thirty days with a 100% satisfaction assure. We’re providing you entry to the one crypto-intelligence platform on this planet that may give you the very same buying and selling alerts as establishments and hedge funds in actual time … earlier than this data turns into public data.

Cointelegraph is a writer of monetary data, not an funding adviser. We don’t present customized or individualized funding recommendation. Cryptocurrencies are risky investments and carry vital threat together with the chance of everlasting and whole loss. Previous efficiency isn’t indicative of future outcomes. Figures and charts are appropriate on the time of writing or as in any other case specified. Reside-tested methods will not be suggestions. Seek the advice of your monetary advisor earlier than making monetary selections.

All ROIs quoted are correct as of 8:00 am UTC on Dec. 1, 2022